Controversy: Definitions To The World Called Earth

What explains the world? What gives definitions to every phenomena which takes place in this world we live in? What gives these happenings the explanation? 

Now, today, physics and chemistry, do. Everything is explained by these two major fields of science. What happens when lighting strikes? A few giga counts of watt is flashed down, causing this to happen, that to happen. Yes, physics explains it. What happens when dirt on clothing is submerged in water? Particles are suspended and they come off. And so it seems, according to chemistry laws. But wait. There's a catch here.

"according to chemistry/ physics laws..."

Who sets those laws? Sir Isaac Newton? Who was he? Why was he that important? Was it because he dicovered the gravitational pull of the Earth? If so, it is until after he had done something, then people started giving him a certain deal of respect! But remember: isn't he a human as well? Wasn't he alive, the same with us? He wasn't a god for sure! Just imagine if there was a genius amongst us and hasn't shown off his great masterly skills yet, would someone or rather anyone respect him for being a nobody? And it is because of these insanity, these beliefs, people tend to explain every damn phenomena on this Earth by quoting physics and chemistry laws! These laws weren't set by god, were they? They can easily say that these laws are naturally occurent, and were here for a long time already. Since the age of the dinosaurs, they might say. Well, how well do they know? According to historians? Archaeologists? Do you know what I would just have done upon hearing these so-called evidences? I'd scoff. Every sane person living on this Earth will know that every person, does commit error. No matter how great or how small the error is, it is still an error. Could it be that because of a pioneer archaeologist that all the others followed que and said that those rock animal shaped things were dinosaurs? What say they miscalculated the time range? What say he wanted popularity and he orally added some mystery into it? I do not believe in science. I do not believe in physics, nor chemistry. How well can they explain the happenings of the world? As far as I know, all the happenings are only defined by laws made by men and rules set by man. All rules and regulations are set by men and since when men had no mistakes at all? They have them by them all the time? People just do not give them space for errors! Nature is not equivalent to men's judgements, therefore men cannot explain nature's happenings. 

To me, whatever explains the happenings of the world, is music. Sound, some may call it, but I'd refer it to music more. Music explains everything happening on the surface of the Earth. When we look at something happening, we hear a sound. It is definite that we hear a sound, because generally audible sounds are present every moment. Even the deaf, can hear it. His own sound, his intrigues looming up deep from his heart. Those send him sounds that only he can hear. Whatever we hear, affects our perception towards the happening of a mystery. I call it music. When someone sings rather badly, or plays an instrument rather poorly, he calls it music. Bad, unshaped music. But passer-bys. What do they call it? Sound. Noise pollution! So what explains these kind of reaction towards bad music? Reactions from the surroundings. People cover their ears with their hand and give a very disrespectful comment. These are all very minor reactions that many may not see. So, he, upon hearing these disrespectful comments, is inspired to give an explanation himself: he is a bad singer/ player. Music explains it all. When chinese drums are heard, collaborated with a certain rhythm and trumpets, one will know that it is a funeral. And his mind will inteprate it upon hearing the music played. Nature, is defined. Scientist find it so hard to explain some rare phenomena because the ideas that come to their mind opposes another's authorized theory. But his theory may not be right. Even after all the tests, there must just be a test to prove it completely wrong. A proven test must be a 100% correct theory, no failures. But some of these theories accpeted today are only 99% right. Even so, they are still followed. Why? When nature seems hard to define, the natural instinct of the human mind will define it accurately, without mistake. After all, the human mind is designed by God, isn't it? God, designed nature, didn't he? 

Nature, is in God's hand, isn't it?